You're viewing Docket Item 42 from the case Stiger v. Haynes. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 2:13-cv-00025-SWW Document 42 Filed 11/04/13 Page 1 of 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EASTERN DIVISION

THOMAS HAROLD STIGER,
Reg #39053-115

v.

Petitioner

ANTHONY HAYNES, Warden,
FCI - Forrest City

Respondent

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

ORDER

No. 2:13CV00025-SWW-JJV

By order and judgment entered July 31, 2013, the Court dismissed this action brought

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and on October 7, 2013, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion for

reconsideration. On September 13, 2013, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal, and on November

3, 2013, the Clerk’s office administratively entered a motion for a certificate of appealability. In

this case, the question of whether a certificate of appealability should be granted need not be

answered because such certificates are not required in habeas corpus cases brought solely under

28 U.S.C. 2241. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(requiring a certificate of appealability from final order in

a habeas proceeding in which detention arises from state court process or a final order in a

proceeding under § 2255); see also Lindstrom v. Graber, 203 F.3d 470, 473 (7th Cir.2000). In

any event, a certificate of appealability is denied because Petitioner has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013.

/s/Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE