You're viewing Docket Item 3 from the case Madden v. Mills. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 3:13-cv-00196-JLH Document 3 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

STEVE MADDEN

v.

NO. 3:13CV00196 JLH

LARRY MILLS, Sheriff,
Poinsett County Detention Center

ORDER

PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANT

Steve Madden has filed a pro se action against Larry Mills, Sheriff of Poinsett County. In his

statement of the claim he says, “Larry Mills did not give me proper medical assistance when I was

locked up.” That one sentence constitutes all of Madden’s allegations.

Because Madden is seeking leave to proceed pro se in an action seeking relief against a

governmental entity, or an officer or employee of a governmental entity, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The

Court must dismiss the complaint if it, or any portion of it, is frivolous, malicious, or fails to seek a

claim upon which relief may be granted; or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune

from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). To state a claim for relief, a complaint must contain a short

and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(3).

While Rule 8(a)(2) does not require a complaint to contain detailed factual allegations, it does require

a plaintiff to state the grounds of his entitlement to relief, which requires more than labels and

conclusions. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1964-65, 167 L. Ed.

2d 929 (2007). “While courts liberally construe pro se complaints, pro se litigants must still allege

sufficient facts to state a plausible claim for relief.” Ellis v. City of Minneapolis, 518 Fed. Appx. 502

(8th Cir. 2013).

Here, Madden has alleged no facts to support his claim. The Court therefore directs that he

file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order. The amended

Case 3:13-cv-00196-JLH Document 3 Filed 09/19/13 Page 2 of 2

complaint must state the name of each person individually involved in the actions at issue in the

complaint; how each individual was personally involved in those actions; and how each individual

violated Madden’s constitutional rights. Madden must state specific facts concerning the allegations

he is making, including, where applicable, dates, times, and places. If he wishes to name additional

defendants concerning his allegations, he must state specific facts concerning the allegations as to

each defendant.

In accordance with the above instructions, Madden must file an amended complaint within

thirty (30) days of this Order. If he fails to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 5.2(c)(2), which states:

If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within
thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding
pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2013.


J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2