You're viewing Docket Item 5 from the case Hopewell v. Norris. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 2:13-cv-02085-PKH Document 5 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

MICHAEL EDISON HOPEWELL

PLAI N TIFF

v.



Case No. 2:13-CV-02085

S. RYAN NORRIS







DEFENDANT

ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 3) from Chief United

States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections

(Doc. 4).

After reviewing the record de novo as to Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the

Magistrate’s reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor

fact requiring departure from the Magistrates’ findings. The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings

and recommendations of the Magistrate in full.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma

pauperis is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2013.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III

P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE