You're viewing Docket Item 20 from the case Bordock v. Fort Smith Arkansas, City of et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 2:13-cv-02184-PKH Document 20 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 72

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

LAURIE BORDOCK



PLAINTIFF

v.



Case No. 2:13-CV-02184

THE CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS; and
THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY

DEFENDANT

O R D E R

Currently before the Court is the report and recommendation (Doc. 13) filed in this case on

October 11, 2013, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the

Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 14).

The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as

follows: The Court cannot discern from Plaintiff’s objections any law or fact requiring departure

from the Report and Recommendation. Rather, the report of the magistrate appears to be well

reasoned and the recommendation to be sound.

Accordingly, the Court finds that the report and recommendation of the Magistrate is proper

and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. For the reasons stated in the

Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment will be

entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of December, 2013.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III

P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

-1-