You're viewing Docket Item 50 from the case USA v. Venegas et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:






DAVID D. FISCHER (SBN 224900)
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID D. FISCHER, APC
1007 7th Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA. 95814
Tel. (916) 447-8600
Fax (916) 930-6482
E-Mail: [email protected]

Attorney for Defendant
NEMESSIS ROSENDO VENEGAS



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



Plaintiff,




UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,



v.

EDILIO NAVARRO
NEMESSIS ROSENDO VENEGAS



Defendants.






No. 2:12-CR-00310 TLN

STIPULATION REGARDING
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER
SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND
ORDER



)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)





STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the

defendants, by and through each counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:





1.

2.

By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 31, 2013.

By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference

until December 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. and to exclude time between October 31, 2013, and

December 19, 2013, under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.





3.

a.

The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

The government initially provided 32 pages of investigative reports. These

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28





reports show that there are additional audio and video recordings and other evidence available

for inspection and copying. Defense counsel for defendant Venegas is working on providing

1

2

3

reciprocal discovery and needs additional time to gather and organize this discovery to provide

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

to the government.



b.

Counsel for the defendants desires additional time to consult with their

respective clients, to review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to

the charges, to review and copy discovery for this matter, to discuss potential resolutions with

their clients, to prepare pretrial motions, and to otherwise prepare for trial.



c.

Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested

continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking

into account the exercise of due diligence.





d.

e.

The government does not object to the continuance.

Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the

case as requested outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.



f.

For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §

3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 31, 2013, to

20

December 19, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and

21

22

23

24

B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s

request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

25



4.

Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other

provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the

period within which a trial must commence.

26

27

28



2







IT IS SO STIPULATED.

1

2

3









Dated: October 28, 2013


4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18






























Dated: October 28, 2013






Dated: October 28, 2013



































































BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

U.S. ATTORNEY

By:




/s/ David D. Fischer for
SAMUEL WONG
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff













/s/ David D. Fischer
DAVID D. FISCHER
Attorney for Defendant
NEMESSIS ROSENDO VENEGAS



/s/ David D. Fischer for
MICHAEL PETRIK
Attorney for Defendant
EDILIO NAVARRO



O R D E R

19



UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is

20

ordered that the October 31, 2013, status conference hearing be continued to

21

December 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel

22

and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to

23

grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time

24

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

25

diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a

26

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

27

speedy trial. It is ordered that time beginning from October 31, 2013, up to and

28

including the December 19, 2013, status conference shall be excluded from



3



1

2

3

computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced

under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and

Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

4



5

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2013.

















6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



4