You're viewing Docket Item 10 from the case Strickland v. Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 2:12-cv-02898-KJM-JFM Document 10 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICKI L. STRICKLAND,

Plaintiff,

No. 2: 12-cv-2898 KJM JFM

vs.

FAIRFIELD-SUISUN UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,

ORDER

Defendant.

/

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on August 20, 2012 by filing

a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Solano. Thereafter,

defendant filed a notice of removal. (See Dkt. No. 1.) On December 6, 2012, defendant filed a

motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for January 17, 2013 before the undersigned. (See

Dkt. No. 6.) On December 27, 2012, plaintiff, proceeding through counsel Sabina Sadykhova,

filed a first amended complaint. (See Dkt. No. 8.)

Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the case will be referred back to

the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should

now be noticed for hearing before the District Judge assigned to this action. The undersigned

magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

1

Case 2:12-cv-02898-KJM-JFM Document 10 Filed 01/08/13 Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action; and

2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated.

DATED: January 7, 2013.

14
stri2898.referback

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2