You're viewing Docket Item 33 from the case USA v. Soria et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA




Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:13-cr-00219 LJO SKO


)

)





DETENTION ORDER


EASTERN


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )











VS. )








ERIC ALBERTO HERRERA,









)
)
)


Defendant. )

_____________________________________ )

A. Order For Detention

After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court
orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).


B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention
The Court orders the defendant's detention because it finds:
X By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will



reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.

X By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.

C. Findings Of Fact





The Court's findings are based on the evidence which was presented in Court, and that which was contained
in the Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:
X (1) Nature and circumstances of the offense charged:

X (a) The crimes:

18 U.S.C. § 371-Conspiracy to Steal and Possess Stolen Mail; 18 U.S.C. § 1708-

Possession of Stolen U.S. Mail and 18 U.S.C. § 1708-Theft of U.S. Mail











(a) General Factors:

are serious crimes and carry a maximum penalty of: 5yrs/$250,000


(b) The offense is a crime of violence.
(c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
(d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances, to wit:







(2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is high.
(3) The history and characteristics of the defendant, including:

The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the defendant will














appear.
UNK The defendant has no family ties in the area.
UNK The defendant has no steady employment.
UNK The defendant has no substantial financial resources.
UNK The defendant is not a long time resident of the community.
UNK The defendant does not have any significant community ties.
Past conduct of the defendant:


UNK The defendant has a history relating to alcohol abuse.
UNK The defendant has a significant prior criminal record.
The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.


UNK The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.

The defendant has a history of violating parole.
The defendant has a history of probation and parole violations.




















PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com


DETENTION ORDER - Page 2





(b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court:

At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:










Probation
Parole
X Release pending trial, sentence, appeal, or completion of sentence.
(c) Other Factors:
The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
The defendant is a legal alien and will be subject to deportation if convicted.
Other:











(4) The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant's release are as follows:

(5) Rebuttable Presumptions

[The defendant is subject to a no-bail immigration detainer.] OR
[The defendant is a sentenced state prisoner.] [WRIT]











In determining that the defendant should be detained, the Court also relied on the following rebuttable
presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. §3142(e) which the Court finds the defendant has not rebutted:
a. That no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of

the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community because
the Court finds that the crime involves:

years or more; or,

(A) A crime of violence;
(B) An offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death;
(C) A controlled substance violation which has a maximum penalty of 10

(D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of 2 or more prior














b. That no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of

offenses described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior
conviction for one of the crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which is
less than 5 years old and which was committed while the defendant was on
pretrial release.

the defendant as required and the safety of the community because the Court finds that
there is probable cause to believe:






































D. Additional Directives













has a maximum penalty of 10 years or more.

(A) That the defendant has committed a controlled substance violation which

(B) That the defendant has committed an offense under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)

(uses or carries a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence,

including a crime of violence, which provides for an enhanced punishment if

committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or device).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:
The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility
separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending
appeal; the defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and, that on order
of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the
corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the
purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.



IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto