You're viewing Docket Item 8 from the case (HC) Kelley v. Wofford. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:13-cv-01313-SAB Document 8 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 2







UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



MARC A. KELLEY,

Petitioner,

v.

CARL WOFFORD, Warden,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01313-SAB-HC

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE









Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

20



On September 19, 2013, following a preliminary review of the petition, the Court issued

21

22

23

24

an order directing Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to

exhaust state remedies. On October 4, 2013, Petitioner filed a response to the order wherein he

attached copies of a habeas petition filed in the California Supreme Court along with its ruling.

The Court has reviewed the attachments, and it appears Petitioner has exhausted the claims he

25

presents in his petition.

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

Case 1:13-cv-01313-SAB Document 8 Filed 10/25/13 Page 2 of 2

1

2



Accordingly, the September 19, 2013, order to show cause is HEREBY DISCHARGED.

ORDER



3

4

5

6


IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2013




_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_

7



8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2