You're viewing Docket Item 11 from the case Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:






Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Document 11 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11







UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UPENDRA SINGH,

No. 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC

Plaintiff,



ORDER

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

12



13

14

15

16



Two orders issued September 20, 2013, dismissing this

action and denying Plaintiff’s ex parte applications for a

temporary restraining order for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. (See ECF Nos. 6, 9.) The second order dismissed the

17

action without leave to amend.

18

19

20



Plaintiff’s counsel, Aldon Bolanos, subsequently called

and then e-mailed the undersigned judge’s courtroom deputy clerk

the attached e-mail correspondence. In the e-mail, Mr. Bolanos

21

states, in part:

22

23

24

25

26

27

28






Did I upset someone over there? We filed our
complaint on diversity grounds, and the court
sua sponte gave us 10 days to file an
amendment
jurisdictional
issues. So we just finished doing that and
he again, sua sponte, dismissed the case
without leave to amend.

address

to

No reasons given, no hearing given, just
SLAM!

I am thinking maybe this second order is a
mistake. Can you please give me a call?

1







Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Document 11 Filed 09/20/13 Page 2 of 4

1



Mr. Bolanos’ communications with the courtroom deputy

2

clerk are woefully inappropriate. Although it is conceivable that

3

Mr. Bolanos’ attempts to communicate with the courtroom deputy

4

clerk stem from his failure to understand the reasoning set forth

5

in the referenced orders, the courtroom deputy clerk should not

6

be subjected to such inquiries about a judge’s order. She did not

7

write the orders, they are judicial decisions. This should be

8

obvious to any attorney practicing in this court. Further, the

9

communications were attempted improper ex parte communications

10

with chambers.

11



Therefore, Mr. Bolanos shall discontinue attempting to

12

communicate with the courtroom deputy clerk about this matter. If

13

Mr. Bolanos continues in his attempts to communicate with the

14

courtroom deputy clerk concerning the subject of his e-mail

15

communication, he will be subject to an order to show cause why

16

he should not be sanctioned for disobedience of this order. If

17

Mr. Bolanos and his client want to request something from the

18

Court, it should be requested in a writing filed on the public

19

docket.

Dated: September 20, 2013





20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28










2





Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Document 11 Filed 09/20/13 Page 3 of 4

Page 1 of 2

Fwd: Activity in Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Judgment
Aldon L. Bolanos, Esq.
to:
sfurstenau
09/20/2013 01:08 PM
Sent by:
[email protected]
Hide Details
From: "Aldon L. Bolanos, Esq." <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]







Sent by: [email protected]








History: This message has been forwarded.

Shani:

Did I upset someone over there? We filed our complaint on diversity grounds, and the court sua sponte
gave us 10 days to file an amendment to address jurisdictional issues. So we just finished doing that and
he again, sua sponte, dismissed the case without leave to amend.

No reasons given, no hearing given, just SLAM!

I am thinking maybe this second order is a mistake. Can you please give me a call? 916.446.2800.

Aldon Bolanos
Law Offices of Aldon Bolanos
925 G Street, The Van Voorhies Mansion, Sacramento, California 95814 | (916) 446.2800 | www.aldonlaw.com
Sacramento | Los Angeles | San Francisco








---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM
Subject: Activity in Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Judgment
To: [email protected]

file://C:\Documents and Settings\SFurstenau\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1940...

9/20/2013

Page 2 of 2

Case 2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Document 11 Filed 09/20/13 Page 4 of 4



This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT
RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy
permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free
electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the
filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each
document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free
copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

Eastern District of California - Live System

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 9/20/2013 at 1:01 PM PDT and filed on 9/20/2013
Case Name:
Case Number:
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 09/20/2013
Document Number:10

Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC

Docket Text:
JUDGMENT dated *9/20/13* entered pursuant to order signed by Judge Garland E.
Burrell, Jr., on 9/20/13. (Kastilahn, A)


2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Aldon Louis Bolanos [email protected], [email protected]

2:13-cv-01946-GEB-AC Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer
to:



file://C:\Documents and Settings\SFurstenau\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1940...

9/20/2013