You're viewing Docket Item 38 from the case Rodriguez v. Taco Bell Corp.. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 1 of 6







UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARDINA RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

TACO BELL CORP.,

Defendant.



Case No. 1:13-cv-01498-SAB

ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

DATE:
TIME:
CTRM:

STANLEY A. BOONE
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

December 12, 2013
3:30 p.m.
#9 (6th Floor)

Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) requires the Court to








enter a Scheduling Conference Order within 120 days of the date of the complaint being served

upon the defendant. Therefore, it is ordered that all parties attend a formal Scheduling

Conference before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, in Courtroom 9 at the

United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23



Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory for all parties. Parties may appear

24

25

26

27

by their counsel, if represented. Only counsel who are thoroughly familiar with the facts and the

law of the instant case and who have full authority to bind his or her client shall appear. Trial

counsel should participate in this Scheduling Conference whenever possible. Counsel should

plan to spend up to thirty (30) minutes in this Scheduling Conference.

28

/ / /

1

Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 2 of 6

1



A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel/pro se parties



2

shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference.

3



If any party fails to participate in preparing the Joint Scheduling Report, the non-

4

5

6

7

8

9

offending party shall detail the party’s effort to get the offending party to participate in the Joint

Scheduling Report. The non-offending party shall still file the report one (1) full week prior to

the Mandatory Scheduling Conference and shall list the non-offending party’s proposed dates.

Absent good cause, the dates proposed by the non-offending party will be presumed to be the

dates offered by the parties. The offending party may be subject to sanctions, including

monetary sanctions to compensate the non-offending party’s time and effort incurred in seeking

10

compliance with this Scheduling Order.

11



For reference purposes, the Court requires that the Joint Scheduling Report indicate the

12

date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be placed

13

opposite the caption on the first page of the Report.

14



Among other things, counsel will be expected to discuss the possibility of settlement.

15

16

17

18

Counsel are to thoroughly discuss settlement before undertaking the preparation of the Joint

Scheduling Report and engaging in extensive discovery. However, even if settlement

negotiations are progressing, counsel are expected to comply with the requirements of this Order

unless otherwise excused by the Court. If the entire case is settled, please promptly inform the

19

Court, and counsel’s presence, as well as the Joint Scheduling Report, will not be required.

20



Counsel may request that their attendance be by telephonic conference. If two or

21

22

23

24

more parties wish to appear telephonically, counsel shall decide which will be responsible for

making prior arrangements for the conference call and shall initiate the call at the

above−designated time. Once all parties are on the line, the call should be placed to Judge

Boone’s chambers at (559) 499−5200. Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the

25

face page of their Joint Scheduling Report that the conference will be telephonic.

26

27

28





Form and Contents of the Joint Scheduling Report

At least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial counsel for

all parties shall conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place mutually agreed upon.

2

Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 3 of 6

1

2

3

This should preferably be a personal conference between all counsel but, due to the distances



involved in this District, a telephonic conference call involving all counsel/pro se parties is

permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall respond to the following items by corresponding

4

numbered paragraphs:

5



1.

Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of each

6

party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.

7



2.

A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings shall be included. Any

8

9

proposed amendment to the pleadings presently on file shall be filed by its proponent

contemporaneously with the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be resolved at

10

the Scheduling Conference, the matter will be set as a motion to amend in accordance with the

11

Local Rules of the Eastern District of California.

12

13





3.

4.

A summary detailing the uncontested and contested facts.

A summary of the legal issues as to which there is no dispute, e.g., jurisdiction,

14

venue, applicable federal or state law, etc., as well as summary of the disputed legal issues.

15



5.

The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g., hearings of

16

motions, etc.

17



18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following:

A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;

A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery;

A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses as required by Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(2);

A firm cut-off date for expert witness discovery;

Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);

f.

Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order relating to the

discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential research,

development, or commercial information;

3

Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 4 of 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

g.

Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing or scheduling



of discovery;

h.

Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the United States

and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery;

i.

j.

Whether any party anticipates video and/or sound recording of depositions; and

Whether the parties foresee a need for a Mid-Discovery Status Report and

Conference and, if so, a proposed date for conducting the conference.

8



The discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates by which all discovery must be

9

completed. Discovery motions will not be heard after the discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent

10

11

12

13

14

15

good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery motion if the relief requested requires

the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant discovery deadline. In other words,

discovery requests and deposition notices must be served sufficiently in advance of the discovery

deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and confer, time to prepare, file and hear a

motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to compel. Counsel are expected to take

these contingencies into account when proposing discovery deadlines. All of these dates should

16

be considered firm dates.

17



18

19

20

21

22

23

24

7.

a.

Dates agreed to by all counsel for:

Filing non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions with the understanding

that motions (except motions in limine or other trial motions) will not be

entertained after the agreed upon date, which shall be no later than ten (10) weeks

prior to the proposed Pre-Trial Conference date.

b.

Pre-Trial Conference Date. (This date shall be no later than forty−five (45) days

prior to the proposed trial date.)

c.

Trial date.

25



All of these dates should be considered firm dates. Dates should be set to allow the Court

26

to decide any matters under submission before the Pre-Trial Conference is set.

27



8.

The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement, and must include a statement in

28

the Joint Scheduling Report as to the possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when

4

Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 5 of 6

1

they desire a settlement conference, e.g., before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial



2

motions, etc.

3



9.

A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non−jury case. If the parties

4

5

disagree as to whether a jury trial has been timely demanded or whether one is available on some

or all of the claims, the statement shall include a summary of each party's position.

6



10.

An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot agree,

7

8

each party shall give his or her best estimate. In estimating the number of trial days, the parties

should keep in mind that this court is normally able to devote the entire day to trial.

9



11. Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any other

10

suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.

11



12. Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any other

12

court, including bankruptcy court.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22





Additional Requirements

1.

Discovery Relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic data. Prior to a Fed. R.

Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective client’s

information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its operation, including

how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall also conduct a reasonable

review of their respective client's computer files to ascertain the contents thereof, including

archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and disclose in initial discovery

(self−executing routine discovery) the computer-based evidence which may be used to support

claims or defenses. A party seeking discovery of computer-based information shall notify the

opposing party immediately, but no later than the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, of that fact

23

and identify as clearly as possible the categories of information which may be sought.

24



2.

Duty to Meet and Confer. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the

25

following matters during the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference:

26

27

28

a.

Computer-based information (in general): The parties shall attempt to agree on

steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based information

in order to avoid accusations of spoilation.

5

Case 1:13-cv-01498-SAB Document 38 Filed 10/30/13 Page 6 of 6

b.

E-mail information: The parties shall attempt to agree as to the scope of e-mail



discovery and attempt to agree upon an e-mail search protocol. This should

include an agreement regarding inadvertent production of privileged e-mail

messages.

c.

Deleted information: The parties shall confer and attempt to agree whether or not

restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the extent to which

restoration of deleted information is needed, and who will bear the costs of

restoration; and

d.

Back-up data: The parties shall attempt to agree whether or not back-up data may

be necessary, the extent to which back-up data is needed and who will bear the

cost of obtaining back-up data.

Important Chambers' Information

The parties are directed to the Court's website at www.caed.uscourts.gov under Judges;





Boone (SAB); More Calendaring Information for specific information regarding Chambers’

procedures. Information about law and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances,

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

and discovery disputes is provided at this link.

17



Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory

18

Scheduling Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte

19

hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including monetary sanctions, dismissal,

20

default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed and/or ordered.

21

22

23

24


IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2013




_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_

25



26

27

28

6