You're viewing Docket Item 64 from the case Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case5:10-cv-02863-EJD Document64 Filed03/15/11 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Avago Tech. Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd.,

Plaintiff,

v.
Iptronics, Inc., et al.,

/

Defendants.

NO. C 10-02863 JW
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY; DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXPEDITE
BRIEFING AND TO STRIKE AS MOOT

Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Administrative Motion to Stay Discovery and
Claim Construction Proceedings1 and Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Expedited Briefing and
Hearing and Motion to Strike Defendants’ Administrative Motion.2

Upon review, the Court finds that a stay is premature at this time. Defendants have merely
filed a request for reexamination with the Patent and Trademark Office and there is no indication
that the PTO has granted Defendants’ request. Further, in the event that the PTO were to grant
Defendants’ request, the proper Motion before this Court would be one to shorten time pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 6-3 for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Case currently set for June
27, 2011.

1 (hereafter, “Defendants’ Motion,” Docket Item No. 45.)

2 (hereafter, “Plaintiff’s Motion,” Docket Item No. 52.)

t
t
r
r
u
u
o
o
C
C



t
t
c
c
i
i
r
r
t
t
s
s
i
i
D
D


s
s
e
e
t
t
a
a
t
t
S
S
d
d
e
e
t
t
i
i




n
n
U
U

a
a
i
i
n
n
r
r
o
o
f
f
i
i
l
l
a
a
C
C






f
f
o
o


t
t
c
c
i
i
r
r
t
t
s
s
i
i
D
D
n
n
r
r
e
e
h
h
t
t
r
r
o
o
N
N


e
e
h
h
t
t


r
r
o
o
F
F

Case5:10-cv-02863-EJD Document64 Filed03/15/11 Page2 of 3

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Administrative Motion to Stay. In light of this

disposition, Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite and to Strike is DENIED as moot.

Dated: March 15, 2011


JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

t
r
u
o
C


t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i



n
U

a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F

Case5:10-cv-02863-EJD Document64 Filed03/15/11 Page3 of 3

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
Ary Chang [email protected]
Cynthia Jo Franecki [email protected]
Dana Johannes Finberg [email protected]
Gina Ann Bibby [email protected]
Imran A. Khaliq [email protected]
Jerold I. Schneider [email protected]
Jimmy M. Shin [email protected]
John C. Vetter [email protected]
Matthew Peter Larson [email protected]
Richard Allan Horning [email protected]
Richard S. Florsheim [email protected]
Robert F. Kramer [email protected]
Stephanie Renee Wood [email protected]

Dated: March 15, 2011

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers

Elizabeth Garcia
Courtroom Deputy

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

t
r
u
o
C


t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i



n
U

a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F