You're viewing Docket Item 55 from the case Deane v. Fastenal Company. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case3:11-cv-00042-SI Document55 Filed12/06/11 Page1 of 4

Scott Edward Cole, Esq. (S.B. # 160744)
Molly A. DeSario, Esq. (S.B. # 230763)
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq. (S.B. #230117)
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 891-9800
Facsimile: (510) 891-7030
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

www.scalaw.com

Attorneys for Representative Plaintiffs
and the Plaintiff Classes

EVAN R. MOSES (CA State Bar No. 198099)
[email protected]
ERICA K. ROCUSH (CA State Bar No. 262354)
[email protected]
A. CRAIG CLELAND (Pro Hac Vice)
[email protected]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.442.4810
Facsimile: 415.442.4870

Attorneys for Defendant
FASTENAL COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case No. CV11 00042 SI
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND HEARING ON MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION

KRISTOPHER DEANE and
MICHAEL ROMANO, individually,
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.
FASTENAL COMPANY,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion for Class Certification

-1-


2
1
6
4
9

A
C


,

D
N
A
L
K
A
O


0
0
8
9
-
1
9
8

)
0
1
5
(

:

L
E
T

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28



R
O
O
L
F
H
T
N
N

I




,

Y
A
W
D
A
O
R
B

0
7
9
1





I

R
E
W
O
T
A
V
O
H
C
A
W
E
H
T





C
P
A


,



I

S
E
T
A
C
O
S
S
A
&
E
L
O
C
T
T
O
C
S













W
A
L
T
A
S
Y
E
N
R
O
T
T
A

Case3:11-cv-00042-SI Document55 Filed12/06/11 Page2 of 4

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(b), Plaintiffs Kristopher Deane and Michael Romano
(“Plaintiffs”) and the putative plaintiff classes, and Defendant Fastenal Company (“Defendant”)
enter this Stipulation and submit the accompanying [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion
for Class Certification based on the following facts:

WHEREAS the current hearing date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is March

16, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. (See Dkt. 24).

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is due filed on January 27, 2012,
Defendant’s Opposition is due on February 17, 2012 and Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on March 2, 2012.
(See Dkt. 24).

WHEREAS after extensive meet and confer efforts, the parties have scheduled depositions
of Defendant’s persons most knowledgeable, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule
30(b)(6) on January 24, 25, and 26, 2012. In addition, the parties continue to meet and confer
regarding deposition dates for Plaintiffs, which are unlikely to occur prior to January 1, 2012.

WHEREAS in light of the deposition schedule outlined above, the parties will need
additional time to prepare and file their moving and opposing papers regarding class certification.

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE as follows:
The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification shall be continued to June 15, 2012

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification will be due filed and served on or before April 27,


at 9:00 a.m. subject to the approval of the Court.

2012.


Dated: December 2, 2011





Defendant’s Opposition will be due filed and served on or before May 18, 2012.
Plaintiffs’ Reply will be due filed and served on or before June 1, 2012.




SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC





















By:




/s/ Hannah R. Salassi
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq.
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiffs
And the Plaintiff Classes





Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion for Class Certification

-2-



C
P
A


,



I

S
E
T
A
C
O
S
S
A
&
E
L
O
C
T
T
O
C
S













W
A
L
T
A
S
Y
E
N
R
O
T
T
A





I

R
E
W
O
T
A
V
O
H
C
A
W
E
H
T





R
O
O
L
F
H
T
N
N

I




,

Y
A
W
D
A
O
R
B

0
7
9
1


2
1
6
4
9

A
C


,

D
N
A
L
K
A
O


0
0
8
9
-
1
9
8

)
0
1
5
(

:

L
E
T

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case3:11-cv-00042-SI Document55 Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 4

Dated: December 2, 2011



































OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

By: /s/ Craig Cleland_ ________________________






A. CRAIG CLELAND
EVAN R. MOSES
ERICA K. ROCUSH
Attorneys for Defendant
FASTENAL COMPANY

DECLARATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

I, Hannah R. Salassi, Esq., am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion for Class Certification. In
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby declare that Craig Cleland, attorney for Defendant
Fastenal Company, has read and approved this Stipulation and [Proposed} Order to Extend Hearing
on Motion for Class Certification.

Dated: December 2, 2011

SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC























By:





/s/ Hannah R. Salassi
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq.
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiffs





And the Plaintiff Classes

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion for Class Certification

-3-


2
1
6
4
9

A
C


,

D
N
A
L
K
A
O


0
0
8
9
-
1
9
8

)
0
1
5
(

:

L
E
T

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28



R
O
O
L
F
H
T
N
N

I




,

Y
A
W
D
A
O
R
B

0
7
9
1





I

R
E
W
O
T
A
V
O
H
C
A
W
E
H
T





C
P
A


,



I

S
E
T
A
C
O
S
S
A
&
E
L
O
C
T
T
O
C
S













W
A
L
T
A
S
Y
E
N
R
O
T
T
A

Case3:11-cv-00042-SI Document55 Filed12/06/11 Page4 of 4

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is continued to June 15, 2012 at

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification will be due filed and served on or before April 20,

9:00 a.m.

2012.



Defendant’s Opposition will be due filed and served on or before May 11, 2012.
Plaintiffs’ Reply will be due filed and served on or before May 25, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:






12/6








, 2011






By:









The Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge






Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Hearing on Motion for Class Certification

-4-



C
P
A


,



I

S
E
T
A
C
O
S
S
A
&
E
L
O
C
T
T
O
C
S













W
A
L
T
A
S
Y
E
N
R
O
T
T
A





I

R
E
W
O
T
A
V
O
H
C
A
W
E
H
T





R
O
O
L
F
H
T
N
N

I




,

Y
A
W
D
A
O
R
B

0
7
9
1


2
1
6
4
9

A
C


,

D
N
A
L
K
A
O


0
0
8
9
-
1
9
8

)
0
1
5
(

:

L
E
T

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28