You're viewing Docket Item 75 from the case Deane v. Fastenal Company. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


t
r
u
o
C


t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i
n
U




a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C


f
o




t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

Case4:11-cv-00042-YGR Document75 Filed04/30/12 Page1 of 1










UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA







KRISTOPHER DEANE and MICHAEL
ROMANO, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,,


FASTENAL CO.,



Defendant.

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Case No.: 11-cv-00042-YGR

ORDER REGARDING PERSONAL APPEARANCE
OF COUNSEL TO MEET AND CONFER
REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE











On April 30, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a letter withdrawing their previous letter brief regarding

outstanding discovery issues. (Dkt. No. 74.) The Court issued an Order Requiring Personal
Appearance of Counsel to Meet and Confer Regarding Discovery Dispute on April 27, 2012. (Dkt.
No. 72.) In light of Plaintiffs’ withdrawal of its letter brief, the personal appearance of counsel to
meet and confer on May 1, 2012 at the Federal Courthouse is no longer required.


Dated: April 30, 2012

IT IS SO ORDERED.







_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE