You're viewing Docket Item 29 from the case Nguyen v. ICORE International, Inc. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case5:12-cv-04983-HRL Document29 Filed07/30/13 Page1 of 3











































*E-FILED: July 30, 2013











NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

v.

Plaintiff,

CHANH NGUYEN,




ICORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


____________________________________/

Defendant.





No. C12-04983 HRL


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE



Based on a declaration submitted by defendant that plaintiff has refused to accept any written
communications from defendant’s counsel, engage in substantive oral communication, appear for a
conference call with the Court’s ADR Director, respond to any written discovery, or appear for a
deposition, the Court issued an Order setting a Case Management Conference for July 30, 2013.
(Dkt. 24). The Court ordered the parties to appear in person, and mailed a copy of the Order to
plaintiff.

Plaintiff apparently received the mailing, but did not open it. He sent a letter to the Court in
response and included with his letter the unopened envelope. He wrote “Return to Sender” on the
envelope and stated in his letter: “I am sorry to inform you that I never have concerned to your
Office . . . Therefore I return to you your unlawful and unreasonable letter that you mailed . . . and
please don’t disturb me again.” (Dkt. 26).

The Court held the Case Management Conference on July 30, 2013 and plaintiff did not

appear. Defendant reported that plaintiff has continued to refuse to engage in any form of


t
r
u
o
C


a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i
n
U


f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28



t
r
u
o
C


a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i
n
U


f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F



Case5:12-cv-04983-HRL Document29 Filed07/30/13 Page2 of 3



communication, and has returned all of defendant’s written communications in their unopened
envelopes.

Because of plaintiff’s continued failure to take the necessary steps to prosecute his own case,

including communicating with the Court and appearing at the Case Management Conference, the
Court is prepared to dismiss plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b). All case management deadlines, including the August 28, 2013 Pretrial Conference, are
vacated until further notice. Plaintiff shall appear on August 20, 2013 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 2,
Fifth Floor, 280 South First St., San Jose CA 95113 and show cause, if any, why this case should
not be dismissed. Plaintiff shall file a Statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later
than August 13, 2013. Plaintiff’s failure to appear at the hearing will serve as further grounds for
dismissing the case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2013




HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


2


t
r
u
o
C


a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i
n
U


f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F



Case5:12-cv-04983-HRL Document29 Filed07/30/13 Page3 of 3



C12-04983 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to:
Michael Lewis Wolfram [email protected]

C12-04983 HRL Order will be mailed to:

Chanh Nguyen
3144 King Street, Apt# 3
Berkeley, CA 94703

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

















1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


3