You're viewing Docket Item 80 from the case Bascom Research, LLC v. Broadvision, Inc.. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case3:12-cv-06297-SI Document80 Filed04/23/13 Page1 of 5

PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[email protected]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[email protected]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[email protected]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC

Jon W. Gurka (State Bar No. 187964)
[email protected]
Reza Mirzaie (State Bar No. 246953)
[email protected]
Kendall M. Loebbaka (State Bar No. 285908)
[email protected]
KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone:
Facsimile:

(949) 760-0404
(949) 760-9502

Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

BROADVISION, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 12-cv-06297-SI
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

____________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case3:12-cv-06297-SI Document80 Filed04/23/13 Page2 of 5

Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC (“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc.

(“BroadVision”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(2) and (c), hereby stipulate for an order that:

1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such

counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of

United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”).

BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents

unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a

lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents.

3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties,

each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. The Clerk shall close

this file.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: April 22, 2013

By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka

Lisa Kobialka
Paul Andre
James Hannah
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC

DATED: April 22, 2013

By: /s/ Jon W. Gurka

Jon W. Gurka
Reza Mirzaie

__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case3:12-cv-06297-SI Document80 Filed04/23/13 Page3 of 5

Kendall M. Loebbaka
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC.

__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case3:12-cv-06297-SI Document80 Filed04/23/13 Page4 of 5

ATTESTATION

I, Lisa Kobialka, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation for Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby

attest that the concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from Jon W. Gurka,

counsel for Defendant Broadvision, Inc.

__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case3:12-cv-06297-SI Document80 Filed04/23/13 Page5 of 5

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In consideration of the Stipulated Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC

(“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc. (“BroadVision”), the Stipulated Dismissal is

GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that:

1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed with prejudice.

2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such

counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of

United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”).

BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents

unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a

lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents.

3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties,

each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees.

4. The Clerk shall close this file.

Dated: ____________________

4/23/13

_______________________________
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Court Judge

__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28