You're viewing Docket Item 38 from the case L. et al v. Oakland Unified School District. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:





t
r
u
o
C


t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D

s
e
t
a
t
S
d
e
t
i




a
i
n
r
o
f
i
l
a
C




f
o

t
c
i
r
t
s
i
D
n
r
e
h
t
r
o
N

e
h
t

r
o
F

n
U

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case3:13-cv-00488-RS Document38 Filed07/31/13 Page1 of 1















IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION





v.

N.L., through her parent Y. RUTHERFORD



Plainitff,


OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,




No. C 13-0488 RS


ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
FILE SURREPLY





Defendant.

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), “[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional





_________________________________

memoranda, papers or letter may be filed without prior Court approval.” Defendant Oakland
Unified School District filed a letter with the court requesting the opportunity to file a surreply to
plaintiff’s reply brief, because defendant “believes Plaintiff has regularly misstated and
misrepresented the holdings of the authorities cited therein.” Dkt. 34. Plaintiff, properly construing
defendant’s letter as a motion for administrative relief under Civil Local Rule 7-11, filed an
opposition as permitted by that rule. See Dkt. 35. The request to file a surreply is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7/31/13

RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE