You're viewing Docket Item 35 from the case Haas v. Citibank, N.A. et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 3
Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document35 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 3



Thomas J. D'Amato - 219174
David J. Gibson - 272516
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Tel:
Fax:

Attorneys for Defendant
REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU




(415) 788-1900
(415) 393-8087





UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION)



Plaintiff,

EDWARD HAAS,



v.

CITIBANK, N.A., REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT
BUREAU, INC., MERIUM DOE, MARIA DOE,
PEARL DOE, JAMES DOE, VICTORIA DOE,
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,





Defendants.

Case No.: CV13-01578 SBA

STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL
ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Trial Date: June 9, 2014



/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT

BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER



- 1 -





Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page2 of 3
Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document35 Filed10/04/13 Page2 of 3

TO THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA ARMSTRONG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Edward Haas and

Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. through their counsel of Record, that:

1.

The above-captioned action, Case No. CV13-01578 SBA, is voluntarily dismissed, with

prejudice, against the Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau.

2.

The parties stipulating here, Plaintiff Edward Haas and Defendant Regional Adjustment

Bureau, Inc., shall be responsible for their own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with this litigation.

DATED:






MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY

By /s/ David J. Gibson



David J. Gibson
Attorneys for Defendant
REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



DATED:






LAW OFFICES OF BEN DUPRE

By /s/ Ben Dupre

Ben Dupre
Attorney for Plaintiff
EDWARD HAAS






STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT

BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER



- 2 -

Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page3 of 3
Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document35 Filed10/04/13 Page3 of 3



ORDER

The Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:










DJG.20679954_2.doc

_______________________________________
HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT

BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER



- 3 -