You're viewing Docket Item 17 from the case New York Frankfurter Company of California, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




t
t
r
r
u
u
o
o
C
C



t
t
c
c
i
i
r
r
t
t
s
s
i
i
D
D


s
s
e
e
t
t
a
a
t
t
S
S
d
d
e
e
t
t
i
i




n
n
U
U

a
a
i
i
n
n
r
r
o
o
f
f
i
i
l
l
a
a
C
C



f
f
o
o






t
t
c
c
i
i
r
r
t
t
s
s
i
i
D
D
n
n
r
r
e
e
h
h
t
t
r
r
o
o
N
N


e
e
h
h
t
t


r
r
o
o
F
F

Case3:13-cv-02232-SI Document17 Filed09/20/13 Page1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CATHERINE SCHOOP,
Plaintiff,

v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

/

Defendants.

No. C 13-02230 SI
Related Case Nos. 13-02232, 13-02233
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff Schoop filed this and related actions against defendants to quash summonses. On July
12, 2013, defendant filed a motion to dismiss and compel compliance with the summonses. The hearing
was set for August 30, 2013, and plaintiff’s opposition was due on July 26, 2013. Plaintiff did not file
an opposition, nor did plaintiff request an extension of time.

Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than August
30, 2013, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
41(b). If plaintiff does not respond, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The August 30,
2013 hearing date is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2013




SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge