You're viewing Docket Item 14 from the case Hernandez v. Children's Creative Learning Centers et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case5:13-cv-02246-LHK Document12 Filed07/30/13 Page1 of 2
Case5:13-cv-02246-LHK Document14 Filed07/31/13 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Maria Hernandez
,

Plaintiff(s),




v.

Children's Creative Learning
Center, Inc., et. al
,

_______________________________/

Defendant(s).



CASE NO. ______________________

C 13-02246 LHK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

9

9

9

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:
??

9

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

On July 26, 2013, the

Parties had a mediation with Steve Pearl and are finalizing their settlement negotiations.
_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

?
9

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________

7/30/13

Dated:____________

7/30/13

/s/ Steven M. Tindall
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Jon D. Meer
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case5:13-cv-02246-LHK Document12 Filed07/30/13 Page2 of 2
Case5:13-cv-02246-LHK Document14 Filed07/31/13 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

9

9

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

__________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAGISTRATE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

Lucy H. Koh United States District CourtJuly 31, 2013