You're viewing Docket Item 9 from the case Hopkins v. State of California. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case3:13-cv-02725-CRB Document9 Filed07/30/13 Page1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re RANDELL HOPKINS, V97737,

Plaintiff.

___________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 13-2725 CRB (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On June 13, 2013, the clerk filed as a new prisoner action a letter by

plaintiff complaining of inadequate medical care. On that same date, the court
notified plaintiff in writing that the action was deficient because he did not file an
actual complaint or pay the requisite filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and
completed court-approved in forma pauperis (IFP) application. Plaintiff was
advised that failure to file the requested items within 30 days would result in
dismissal of the action.

More than 40 days have elapsed; however, plaintiff has not provided the

court with the requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so. The action
is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot.

SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 29, 2013



G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.13\Hopkins, R.13-2725.dsifp.wpd

_________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge