You're viewing Docket Item 34 from the case Selleck v. Rode et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case3:13-cv-03055-JST Document34 Filed09/19/13 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA







Linda Buckbee Selleck,





v.




Plaintiff(s),












Keith Rode and
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP,

_______________________________/


Defendant(s).









CASE NO. CV-13-3055 JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS



























Court Processes:
?
?
?

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)


following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:






(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)




Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Parties will select a private
mediator after the completion of discovery and dispositive motions, subject to
agreement of all parties on an appropriate fee split.


Private Process:
?










The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:


?

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )


?

other requested deadline: Following discovery and dispositive motions

Dated: September 17, 2013

Dated: September 17, 2013

Dated: September 17, 2013

WEISBERG & MILLER

____________/s/______________________________
Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr., of counsel, for Plaintiff

MOSS & BARNETT

_____________/s/_____________________________
Thomas J. Shroyer, Counsel for Defendant
CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP


_____________/s/_____________________________
Defendant Keith Rode, in pro per








Case3:13-cv-03055-JST Document34 Filed09/19/13 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER




IT IS SO ORDERED.

?
?

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:



Jon S. Tigar, United States District Court Judge
























































When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”






Rev. 12/11



2396130v1













Page 2 of 2

September 19, 2013XX