Case 1:13-cv-01998-CMA-CBS Document 7 Filed 07/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01998-CMA-CBS
SULLIVAN ONE, LLC
SILVER CINEMAS ACQUISITION CORP.,
d/b/a OLD TOWN THEATER/LANDMARK THEATERS,
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING
The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer by District Judge
Christine M. Arguello, pursuant to the Order Referring Case (doc. #6) filed July 30, 2013. See 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and FED.R.CIV.P. 72(a) and (b).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1) The court shall hold a FED.R.CIV.P. 16(b) scheduling and planning conference on
September 13, 2013, at
9:00 a.m. (Mountain Time)
The conference shall be held in Courtroom A-402, Fourth Floor, of the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,
901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any party1, he or she shall confer with
opposing parties and contact the court to reschedule the conference to a more convenient time. Please
remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be
required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
1The term “party” as used in this Order means counsel for any party represented by a lawyer, and any pro
se party not represented by a lawyer.
Case 1:13-cv-01998-CMA-CBS Document 7 Filed 07/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be
downloaded from the “Forms” section on the Court’s website under the “Standardized Order Forms”
order and also email an editable version to [email protected]
no later than:
In accordance with D.C. COLO. ECF. PROC. 5.12, the parties shall file their proposed scheduling
Seven (7) days prior to the
(2) In preparation for the scheduling/planning conference, the parties are directed to confer in
accordance with FED.R.CIV.P. 26(f), no later than:
Twenty-one (21) days prior to the
In those cases in which: (i) the parties’ substantive allegations involve extensive computer-
The court strongly encourages the parties to meet face to face, but should that prove impossible, the parties
may meet by telephone conference. All parties are jointly responsible for arranging and attending the Rule
During the Rule 26(f) meeting, the parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and
defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, make or arrange for the
disclosures required by FED.R.CIV.P. 26(a)(1), and develop their proposed scheduling/discovery plan. The
parties should also discuss the possibility of informal discovery, such as conducting joint interviews with
potential witnesses, joint meetings with clients, depositions via telephone, or exchanging documents
outside of formal discovery.
generated records; (ii) a substantial amount of disclosure or discovery will involve information or records
in electronic form (i.e., e-mail, word processing, databases); (iii) expert witnesses will develop testimony
based in large part on computer data and/or modeling; or (iv) any party plans to present a substantial
amount of evidence in digital form at trial, the parties shall confer regarding steps they can take to preserve
computer records and data, facilitate computer-based discovery and who will pay costs, resolve privilege
issues, limit discovery costs and delay, and avoid discovery disputes relating to electronic discovery. The
parties shall be prepared to discuss these issues, as appropriate, in the proposed Scheduling Order and at
the scheduling and planning conference.
have a comprehensive discussion and are required to approach the meeting cooperatively and in good faith.
The parties are reminded that the purpose of the Rule 26(f) meeting is to expedite the disposition of the
action, discourage wasteful pretrial activities, and improve the quality of any eventual trial through more
thorough preparation. The discussion of claims and defenses shall be a substantive, meaningful discussion.
These are the minimum requirements for the Rule 26(f) meeting. The parties are encouraged to
Case 1:13-cv-01998-CMA-CBS Document 7 Filed 07/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
The parties are reminded that pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 26(d), no discovery shall be sought prior to
(3) The parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure requirements of FED.R.CIV.P. 26(a)(1)
the Rule 26(f) meeting.
no later than:
Seven (7) days prior to the
All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C.COLOL.CIVR. 83.3 prior to the
Counsel and parties are reminded that mandatory disclosure requirements encompass computer-based
evidence which may be used to support claims or defenses. Mandatory disclosures must be supplemented
by the parties consistent with the requirements of FED.R.CIV.P. 26(e). Mandatory disclosures and
supplementation are not to be filed with the Clerk of the Court.
(4) All parties are expected to be familiar with the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado Local Rules of Practice (D.C.COLOL.CIVR.). Copies are available through the District Court’s
web site: www.cod.uscourts.gov.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, on July 30, 2013.
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
BY THE COURT: