You're viewing Docket Item 94.3 from the case HATIM et al v. BUSH et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:05-cv-01429-UNA Document 94-4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2

EXHIBIT C

Case 1:05-cv-01429-UNA Document 94-4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2

JUL~I6-2007 16:22

US COURT OF APPEALS

202 219 8530

P.O01!O01

07-1127 .

Mustafa Ahmed Hamlily and MustafaAit ldir, as Next
Fdend of Hamlily, \

Petitioners

Filed On;

UNITED ST.AT_. ,,,.,u~xi u~- APPE ’

Robert M. Gates, Sec. of Defense, et al.,

Respondents

BEFORE: Randolph, Rogers, and Garland, Circuit Judges

CLERK

ORDER

Upon consideration of the amended emergency motion for an.order requiring

respondents to provide 30-days’ advance notice of any intended removal of petitioner,
"and the opposition the.reto, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. This court lacks jurisdiction togrant the
requested relief, S Khalifh v. Gates, No. 07-1215 (D.C. Cir. June 22, 2007) (citing §
7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat, 2600 (2006);
§ 1005(e)(2) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, Pub, L. No, 109-148, 119 Stat.
2680 (2005)); Rahman v. Gates, No. 07-1204 (D.C. Cir, June 19, 2007) (same).

Per Curiam

TOTAL P.O01