You're viewing Docket Item 19 from the case MILLENNIUM TGA, INC. v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:12-mc-00150-ESH-AK Document 19 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


Plaintiff,




MILLENNIUM TGA, INC.,


v.

JOHN DOE,




Defendant.











No. 1:12-mc-00150-ESH-AK











NON-PARTY COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

APRIL 18, 2012 ORDER CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW



Non-Party Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (“Comcast”) respectfully requests an

extension of time of seven (7) days after the Court completes its review (Dkt. 16) of Magistrate

Judge Kay’s Court’s April 18, 2012 Order (“April 18 Order”) (Dkt. 15) to disclose information

required by the April 18 Order, if that Order is affirmed. In support thereof Comcast states as

follows:

1.

On April 18, 2012, Magistrate Judge Kay issued an order granting in part and

denying in part Plaintiff Millennium TGA, Inc.’s (“Millennium’s) motion to compel compliance

with subpoena (Dkt. 1). Comcast had objected to the subpoena and filed an Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt 7). Comcast also filed a Notice of Related Case and Request

for Reassignment (Dkt 8), which was neither addressed nor resolved in the April 18 Order.

2.

Pursuant to the April 18 Order under review, Comcast is required to disclose to

Plaintiff on or before June 17, 2012 certain specified information regarding over 300 of its

Internet services subscribers. On May 2, 2012, Comcast timely filed Objections to the April 18

Order (“Objections”) (Dkt. 16) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed its Response to






Case 1:12-mc-00150-ESH-AK Document 19 Filed 05/24/12 Page 2 of 3

Comcast’s Objections on May 17, 2012 (Dkt. 17) (“Response”). Comcast filed its Reply in

support of its Objections on May 24, 2012.

3.

Comcast has given notice to the affected subscribers. However, in order to

preserve the confidentiality of the subscribers’ identities while review of the April 18 Order is

pending, out of an abundance of caution, Comcast respectfully requests that the date for any

disclosure of information required by the April 18 Order be extended until seven (7) days after

the Court has resolved Comcast’s Objections, if that date is later than June 10, 2012. This will

allow for the Court to consider the matter without the possibility of a required disclosure that

would moot Comcast’s Objections.

4.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7(m), Comcast conferred with counsel for Plaintiff

Millennium TGA, provided him a copy of this motion, and counsel indicated he opposed the

grant of relief sought in this motion.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Comcast respectfully requests that this Court

grant Comcast an extension of time of seven (7) days after the Court’s resolution of Comcast’s

Objections to comply with any disclosures required by the April 18 Order currently under review

if such review is not completed before June 10, 2012.

Dated: May 24, 2012

Respectfully submitted,









































/s/ John D. Seiver
John D. Seiver
Leslie G. Moylan
Lisa B. Zycherman
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 973-4200

Counsel for Non-Party Comcast Cable
Communications Management, LLC



2

Case 1:12-mc-00150-ESH-AK Document 19 Filed 05/24/12 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of May 2012, true and correct copies of the

foregoing document was served via ECF and U.S. Mail upon all counsel of record:

Paul A. Duffy
John L. Steele (pro hac vice)
PRENDA LAW INC.
161 N. Clark Street
Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 880-9160
Fax: (312) 893-5677
Email: [email protected]
















/s/ John D. Seiver
John D. Seiver







4