You're viewing Docket Item 48 from the case Cyberfone Systems LLC v. Federal Express Corporation et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:11-cv-00834-SLR Document 48 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 233

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE




LVL PATENT GROUP, LLC,



C.A. No. 11-834-SLR


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Plaintiff,



v.


FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION;
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC; DHL
EXPRESS (USA), INC.; MOTOROLA
MOBILITY, INC.; GARMIN USA, INC.;
MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION D/B/A/
MAGELLAN; VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC.;
HYPERCOM CORPORATION; INGENICO
CORP.; INGENICO INC.; FIRST DATA
CORPORATION; DELTA AIR LINES, INC.;
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.; SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO.; AMERICAN AIRLINES,
INC.; US AIRWAYS, INC.; AIR CANADA;
AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC.; JETBLUE
AIRWAYS CORPORATION; MARRIOTT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.; STARWOOD
HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.;
INTER-CONTINENTAL HOTELS
CORPORATION; HYATT HOTELS
CORPORATION; HILTON WORLDWIDE,
INC.; AMAZON.COM INC.; PANDIGITAL,
INC.; BARNES & NOBLE, INC.; SONY
ELECTRONICS INC.; AND NINTENDO OF
AMERICA, INC.,



Defendants.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff

LVL Patent Group, LLC and Defendants Ingenico, Inc. and Ingenico Corp., subject to the

approval of the Court, that Ingenico, Inc.’s and Ingenico Corp.’s time to move, answer, or

otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action shall be extended to December 9, 2011.



- 1 -



Case 1:11-cv-00834-SLR Document 48 Filed 11/02/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 234


PARKOWSKI, GUERKE & SWAYZE, P.A.


By:/s/ John C. Andrade

MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP


By: /s/ John P. Fry

John C. Andrade (#1037)
116 W. Water Street
Dover, DE 19904
Telephone: (302) 678-3262
[email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LVL Patent Group, LLC.







John P. Fry (GA Bar #278705)
1600 Atlanta Financial Center
3343 Peachtree Road, NE
Atlanta, GA 30326-1044
Telephone: (404) 504-7728
Facsimile:
(404) 365-9532

Attorneys for Defendant
Ingenico, Inc. and Ingenico Corp.


IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________________, 2011

__________________________________
United States District Judge





- 2 -