You're viewing Docket Item 12 from the case Rericha et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 8:13-cv-00830-JSM-TBM Document 12 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID 244

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

THOMAS RERICHA and DIANE RERICHA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

Case No. 8:13-cv-830-T-30TBM

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11). This Court has considered the issues raised

in Liberty’s motion in the following cases: Zawadzki v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 8:12-cv-950-T-

30MAP, Leon v. First Liberty Ins. Corp., 8:12-cv-1613-T-30MAP, Garcia v. First Liberty Ins. Corp,

8:12-cv-771-T-30TGW, and, most recently, Shelton v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 8:12-cv-2064-T-

30AEP.1 The Court sees no reason to depart from these rulings.

It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on July 30, 2013.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2013\13-cv-830.msj.frm

1Notably, in Shelton, the 2011 amendments were in effect before the inception of the subject policy.