You're viewing Docket Item 16 from the case Marquez v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:






Plaintiff,

CARLOS MARQUEZ,



v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY,





Defendant.



Case No: 6:13-cv-1039-Orl-31KRS

Case 6:13-cv-01039-GAP-KRS Document 16 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 75



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORLANDO DIVISION



ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Portions of Amended Complaint filed

August 15, 2013. This Court's Local Rule 3.01(b) gave the Plaintiff fourteen days after service of

the Motion to respond in opposition. Plaintiff requested and received an extension of time to

respond to the Motion—the extended deadline was September 11, 2013. (Docs. 14, 15). Nine days

have gone by from that date and Plaintiff has still failed to respond to the Motion. In consideration

of the foregoing, it appearing that the motion is meritorious and unopposed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Count II is DISMISSED and paragraph thirty-three

(33) and the jury demand are STRICKEN from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 7).

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on September 20, 2013.





Case 6:13-cv-01039-GAP-KRS Document 16 Filed 09/20/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 76






Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party



- 2 -