You're viewing Docket Item 15 from the case USA v. Hengel et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 1:11-cr-01018-SOM Document 15 Filed 12/20/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 43

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

CR. NO. 11-01018 SOM
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO
APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROBERT HENGEL (1); SHANE
DIEGHAN (2),

Defendants.

___________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

On December 7, 2011, Keith Hampton submitted an

Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (“Application”).
The Court finds that the Application fails to satisfy
the requirements set forth in Rule 83.1(e) of the Local
Rules of Practice of the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii. Specifically, Mr. Hampton
has not included the written consent of local counsel.
Local Rule 83.1(e)(5) (“The application shall include
the address, telephone number, and written consent of
such associate counsel.”). Accordingly, the Court
DENIES the Application without prejudice. Mr. Hampton

Case 1:11-cr-01018-SOM Document 15 Filed 12/20/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 44

may correct the foregoing deficiency and resubmit the
Application to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 20, 2011.

_____________________________
Kevin S.C. Chang
United States Magistrate Judge

CR. NO. 11-01018 SOM; USA V. HENGEL, ET AL.; ORDER DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

2