You're viewing Docket Item 94 from the case USA v. Williams et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CRIMINAL NO. 3:11CR00064-BAJ

CARLA M. CLARK

PRELIMINARY ORDER FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, the United States of America (“the Government”) gave notice to the

defendant Carla Clark (“the defendant”) in the Indictment (Docket Entry # 1) that pursuant to

Title 18, U.S.C. § 982(a)(7), it was seeking the forfeiture of all property, real or personal, that

constitutes or is derived , directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission

of the offense, including but not limited to a sum of money equal to $1,173,370.00; and

WHEREAS, the defendant has plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment, and agreed

in her Plea Agreement (Docket Entry # 52) that the gross proceeds traceable to the commission

of her health care offense are forfeitable, and that the amount of the personal money judgment

would be determined by the Court; and

WHEREAS, the United States has filed a Motion for Entry of an Order of Forfeiture

which would consist of a personal money judgment against the defendant; and

WHEREAS, based on the defendant’s Plea Agreement (Docket Entry # 52), her guilty

plea, and the Factual Summary Stipulation (Docket Entry # 53), page 2, the Court now

determines that the Medicare payments that the defendant received as a result of the false claims

filed in this case are forfeitable to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(7);

Case 3:11-cr-00064-BAJ-SCR Document 89-2 02/06/13 Page 1 of 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a forfeiture money judgment against the defendant,

Carla M. Clark, in favor of the United States, is entered in the amount of THREE HUNDRED

FORTY NINE THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 19/100

($349,715.19), representing the gross proceeds traceable to the commission of her health care

offense.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with the provisions of Rule 32.2, the

Government is permitted to undertake whatever discovery necessary to identify, locate, or

dispose of the property subject to forfeiture or substitute assets for such property.

This Order shall become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing, be made part

of her sentence, and be included in her criminal judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction to

enforce this Order.

SIGNED this day of 2013.

June

4th




BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cr-00064-BAJ-SCR Document 89-2 02/06/13 Page 2 of 2