You're viewing Docket Item 181 from the case United States of America v. Thigpen. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 0:02-cr-00037-DSD-SRN Document 181 Filed 01/19/2005 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Criminal No. 02-37(1) (DSD/SRN)

United States of America,
Plaintiff,

v.
Jeffrey J. Thigpen,

Defendant.

ORDER

D. Gerald Wilhelm, Esq., Deborah R. Peterson, Esq., Mary
Trippler, Esq. and Office of the United States Attorney,
600 United States Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street,
Minneapolis, MN 55415, counsel for plaintiff.
Jeffrey J. Thigpen, pro se defendant.

This matter is before the court upon defendant’s application

for a certificate of appealability and accompanying motions.

The court found no merit in defendant’s section 2255 motion.
Therefore, the court determines that defendant has not made a
“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” as
required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
a
1.

application

Defendant’s

for

certificate

of

appealability [Doc. No. 179] is denied.

[Doc. No. 177] is denied.

2.

Defendant’s motion to compel production of documents

Case 0:02-cr-00037-DSD-SRN Document 181 Filed 01/19/2005 Page 2 of 2

3. Defendant’s motion for leave to conduct discovery [Doc.

No. 178] is denied.

Dated: January 19, 2005

s/ David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court

2