You're viewing Docket Item 37 from the case SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 2:13-cv-01689-APG-NJK Document 37 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
__________________________________________)

vs.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:13-cv-1689-APG-NJK
ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY
PLAN
(Docket No. 36)

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 36. The

discovery plan seeks additional time based on the pendency of the motion to dismiss, motion for
summary judgment, and motion to expunge lis pendens. See id. at 3. However, it appears from the
plan that the parties do not intend to conduct discovery during the pendency of those motions. See id.
(indicating that initial disclosures will not be made until 14 days after a decision on the above motions
is issued). As the Court has previously indicated, “[t]he filing of [dispositive motions] does not
automatically stay the requirement to diligently conduct discovery.” See Docket No. 32 (citing
Tradebay v. eBay, 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011). Accordingly, the pendency of those motions is
not cause for an extended discovery period and the proposed discovery plan is hereby DENIED.

No later than November 21, 2013, the parties shall submit a revised discovery plan in

accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 19, 2013

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28