You're viewing Docket Item 47.2 from the case USA v. Neuhaus et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:

Case 1:12-cr-00439-JG Document 47-2 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 133


Case 1:12-cr-00439-JG Document 47-2 Filed 08/02/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 134



Goodyear, Justin <[email protected]>
Friday, July 20, 2012 7:55 AM
Eric Snyder
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Stokes, Patrick; Jaroslaw, Ilene
Re: Draft joint motion in Word

The government declines your invitation to conduct a criminal investigation of the undercover FBI agent in this case, 
which we deem to be an inappropriate request.  Be assured, however, that we will fully comply with all our legal 
obligations, including Brady – which material will be produced as soon as any is found – and Giglio, which material will 
be produced in a timely manner sufficiently in advance of trial, consistent with the practice in the Eastern District of New 
Likewise, we decline to provide the requested internal DOJ communications; you are not entitled to such 
communications nor are they relevant to the case as it pertains to the criminal prosecution of your client.  
As you may have inferred from our intention to seek a protective order, we decline to provide the true identity of the 
undercover FBI agent. 
None of your requests falls within Rule 16, including Rule 16(a)(1)(E), which calls for production of documents and 
objects that are material to the preparation of the defense. 
Please note that there is a substantial amount of information that we are ready to provide to you immediately upon the 
entry of an appropriate protective order.  The entry of such an order would not prejudice your ability to seek relief from 
the court to obtain the additional information that you seek, and that we believe is not subject to discovery.  Indeed, 
concurring with the joint motion would allow you to obtain relevant discovery in a timely way and still permit you to file 
motions if you find it necessary to do so subsequently. 

From: Eric Snyder [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 09:38 AM
To: Goodyear, Justin
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; McMahon, James (USANYE) ([email protected])
<[email protected]>; Stokes, Patrick
Subject: RE: Draft joint motion in Word

I had also asked if you (or any of the other prosecutors) consulted with OIA before the calls were made to Switzerland 
and the UAE.  Are you able to provide any response to that question? 


Case 1:12-cr-00439-JG Document 47-2 Filed 08/02/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 135

Eric Snyder
+1 202 664 1904


New York | London | Hong Kong | Washington DC | Miami | Cayman Islands | BVI

From: Eric Snyder
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 4:37 PM
To: 'Goodyear, Justin'
Subject: RE: Draft joint motion in Word
When we spoke after the arraignment on Friday, you said that you would get back to me regarding my requests for: 

?The undercover FBI agent’s true name; and  


?Any and all instances of when the same agent (even if under a different undercover identity) violated the laws of
any other countries, the Attorney General’s Guidelines, FBI Guidelines or Regulations, or any other applicable
guidelines or regulations. (Obviously, we would need this to include any instances of wrongdoing from the
ongoing investigations as well as those which have since been closed.)

As I explained during our discussion in the Courthouse, it is important that we not be impeded in developing this
information for use in our defense at trial. And, absent some agreement that we will get all of this information directly from
the Government, we will need to try to locate it through our own investigation.

Please let me know if you will be able to provide this information to us.


Eric Snyder
+1 202 664 1904


New York | London | Hong Kong | Washington DC | Miami | Cayman | BVI
From: Goodyear, Justin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 11:44 AM
To: Eric Snyder
Subject: Draft joint motion in Word
Please let me know if you’d like to discuss this, or feel free to send a version with proposed edits. 


Case 1:12-cr-00439-JG Document 47-2 Filed 08/02/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 136

This e-mail message is from Kobre & Kim LLP, a law firm, and may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail message and
any attachments from your computer without retaining a copy.

IRS Circular 230 disclosure: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including
any attachments or enclosures) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed
in this communication. (The foregoing disclaimer has been affixed pursuant to U.S.
Treasury regulations governing tax practitioners.)