You're viewing Docket Item 47 from the case Coble et al v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 7:11-cv-01037-ER-GAY Document 47 Filed 04/10/13 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

USD0 SDNY
DOCL.1E
ELEC-

LLY FLED

ELIZABETH COBLE, MILAGROS HARPER and
DENNIS HARPER, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

11 Civ. 1037 (ER)(GAY)

-against-

COHEN & SLAMOWITZ, LLP, DAVID COHEN, ESQ,
MITCHELL SLAMOWITZ, ESQ., LEANDRE JOHN, ESQ.
and CRYSTAL S.A. SCOTT, ESQ.,

Defendants.

Before the Court is a discovery dispute concerning plaintiffs’ discovery demand for

the personal income tax returns of defendants David Cohen and Mitchell Slamowitz for

the years 2009 - 2012. Plaintiffs asserts that the tax returns are relevant to substantiate

the net worth of said defendants.

In class actions under the Fair Debt Collection

Practices Act recoverable damages are limited to the lesser of $500,000 or 1% of the

debt collector’s net worth. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiffs contend that

defendants Cohen and Slamowitz are debt collectors personally involved in the

collection of the accounts at issue herein. Defendants set forth that they have offered to

provide net worth statements prepared by accountants and sworn to be said

defendants. Defendants also contend that said defendants were not personally

involved in the collection of the debt; and that disclosure of sensitive tax returns should

not be required given their offer to provide sworn net worth statements.

Case 7:11-cv-01037-ER-GAY Document 47 Filed 04/10/13 Page 2 of 2

___________________________

The Court concludes that plaintiffs have made a sufficient threshold showing that

defendant Cohen and defendant Slamowitz were personally involved in the collection of

the accounts herein. As such, the net worth of said defendants would be relevant to the

issue of recoverable class damages. See Miller v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman,

Eisman, Greenberg, Formato & Einiger, LLP, No. CV 10-2156, 2011 WL 6105033, at *2

(E.D.N.Y. Dec. 7,2011). However, net worth discovery of individual defendants is often

provided by less intrusive means than income tax returns.

Simon v. Williams &

Fudge, Inc., No. 07 Civ. 2856, 2008 WL 268294, at *1(SDNY Jan. 28, 2008)(sworn

affidavits stating net worth including balance sheets listing assets and liabilities ordered

for punitive damages discovery); see

Sabatelli v. Allied Interstate, Inc., No. 05-32-

5, 2006 WL 2620385 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2006); Collins v. City of New York, 222 F.R.D.

249, 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).

Accordingly, the Court directs defendant Cohen and defendant Slamowitz to provide

net worth statements prepared by licensed accountants and sworn to be said

defendants for the years requested by plaintiffs. The Court will give plaintiffs leave to

renew their request for the tax returns if upon a review of the net worth statements they

can demonstrate a compelling need for the same.

Dated April 9 2013
White Plains, New York

SO ORDERED:

/7

GEORGE A. YANTH1fr U.SMJ.

2