You're viewing Docket Item 285 from the case McDannold, et al v. Star Bank NA Cinci, et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case: 1:94-cv-00002-TMR Doc #: 285 Filed: 06/03/99 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 55

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO


WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON


WILLIAM P. McDANNOLD, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

Case No. C-1-94-002

-vs-

CHIEF JUDGE WALTER HERBERT RICE

STAR BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendant(s).

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE


JURY VERDICT: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have
been tried and the Jury has rendered its verdict.

X

DECISION BY COURT: This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court expressly finds that there is no just reason for delay;

that the settlement agreements dismissing the Plaintiffs' claims against Lindhorst & Dreidame (L&D),
William Kirkham and Gradison are approved;

that the Plaintiffs' claims against Lindhorst & Dreidame (L&D), William Kirkham and Gradison &
Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

that the liability ofthe non-settling Defendants shall be reduced, on a pro tanto basis, by $1,750,000, the
amount paid by Lindhorst & Dreidame (L&D), William Kirkham and Gradison & Company to settle the
Plaintiffs' claims;

that the approval of the settlement agreements, which contain bar orders, will preclude the assertion of
claims for indemnification and/or contribution against the settling Defendants;

and that this Court certifies the Decision for an immediate appeal pursuant to 28 V.S.c. § 1292(b).

Date: June 3, 1999

Kenneth J. Mumhy, Clerk

BY~~/·

Deputy Clerk

. yS
.r:J