You're viewing Docket Item 8 from the case Jackson v. Frye et al. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case: 2:13-cv-00239-GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 06/04/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 39

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

DEANGELO A. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD A. FRYE, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action 2:13-cv-239
Judge Judge C. Smith
Magistrate Judge Deavers

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s

May 9, 2013 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 5). The Magistrate Judge conducted an

initial screen of Plaintiff’s Complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and recommended

that the Court dismiss this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the

right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 6-7, ECF No. 5). The time period for

filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to

the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections

have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the

Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action for failure to

state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Case: 2:13-cv-00239-GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 06/04/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 40

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2