You're viewing Docket Item 23 from the case Ricker v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 6:12-cv-00664-CL Document 23 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 748

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MICHELLE RICKER,

Petitioner,

Civ. No. 12-00664-CL

v.

ORDER

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Respondent.

PANNER, District .Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report ahd

Recommenda'tion, and the matter is now before this court. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Respondent filed

objections, petitioner filed a response to respondent's

objections, and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28

U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus.

1 - ORDER

Case 6:12-cv-00664-CL Document 23 Filed 07/30/13 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 749

Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th. Cir. 1981).

I have given this matter de novo review.

I find no error.'

Accordingly,. I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#19). The

decision of the administrative law judge is reversed and the

matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the

Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDEBED.

DATED this ~[) day of July, 2 013.

OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER