You're viewing Docket Item 35 from the case Ricker v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration. View the full docket and case details.

Download this document:




Case 6:12-cv-00664-CL Document 35 Filed 02/24/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 792

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

MICHELLE RICKER,

Petitioner,

Civ. No. 12-00664-CL

v.

ORDER

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Respondent.

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and

Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed

objections, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff's pbjections,

and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. §

636 (b) ( 1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,

1 - ORDER

Case 6:12-cv-00664-CL Document 35 Filed 02/24/14 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 793

Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

I have given this matter de novo review.

I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#30).

Plaintiff's motion for prevailing party fees (#25) is DENIED.

IT IS

SO ORDERED.

DATED

this~ day of February, 2014.

M. PANNER
DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER